|
Types
of Life Assurance
Term Life Insurance
Term insurance is, as the name suggests, a
policy which only pays out if you die within a specified term.
This could be 10, 20, or 30 years from the date the policy
commences.
This is the simplest type of life cover, and
it usually demands that you pay a premium on some sort of
regular basis in order to be covered. The amount of that premium
depends on both the amount of money you have agreed as the
death benefit and the statistical likelihood you will die.
You are effectively gambling with the Life Company on whether
or not you will die during a certain period. If you die you
"win" and someone gets the payout. If you don't
die you "lose" and you get nothing at the end of
the insured period because you are still alive. This is one
bet we all want to lose.
Term assurance is generally low cost and is
expected to fall over time barring a major impact disease.
Just because nothing involving insurance can ever be simple,
there are several main types of term life assurance. The first,
level term, is the most commonly advertised. This is a form
of term assurance that locks in the premium costs for as long
as you hold the policy i.e.: you pay the same amount throughout.
It means you may appear to pay over the odds each month when
you are younger, but that is balanced by savings on the "real"
cost of premiums as you get older. You also get the benefit
of paying at today's prices. As the real value of your premiums
erodes in future, you make substantial savings.
Other types of term assurance include:
- Escalating term assurance: these
schemes demand you pay more each year, so the amount you
would get at death goes up. They tend to be cheap when you
are young and healthy but more expensive as you get older.
- Increasing term assurance:
you increase the amount of death payment at set times or
whenever you choose (such as when you have a child). Obviously
you then have to pay more each month. A better alternative
is renewable term assurance -- you can get this option built
into some ordinary level term assurance plans. It allows
you to take out a new term assurance plan when your original
deal ends, regardless of your state of health at that time.
- Decreasing term assurance: this
is mortgage protection type assurance. The monthly payments
stay the same, but the amount of cover you get for that
goes down every year. This sort of insurance is sometimes
sold alongside a repayment mortgage, and the death benefit
drops in line with the amount you have left to pay off on
your loan. It's also useful for parents -- as your children
grow up and leave home, you will only need to insure for
a smaller amount of death benefit.
- Convertible term assurance: here
you can convert the term assurance aspect of the policy
to a whole of life (non term) investment assurance policy
at any point in the future before term end. The beneficial
point is that the price of your future investment policy
is based on your health when you bought the cheaper premiumed
term assurance.
Whole of Life Policies
When you buy a whole of life policy, it covers
you right up until death -- whenever that may be. Provided,
of course, that you keep paying in the premiums.
This type of policy is more expensive than
term assurance as you would expect and more complex. The money
in your account earns some interest each year. Depending on
how fast that grows, your annual premiums can actually go
down over time, and there may come a stage when the interest
on your savings will cover all your premiums so there's nothing
more to pay.
The cash-in-value of this type of policy may
or may not be equal to the amount of money you have paid into
it over the years, depending on the investment.
You need to make your own decision about what
sort of life cover you think you need. The simplest kind is
a level term assurance policy with a renewable option so you've
got cover for as long as you need it. Ultimately you may just
want a lump sum to be payable to your dependants should you
die at an inconvenient time.
Which is best, term or whole of life?
If the need for life cover is for a fixed
term such as while your children are growing up, then choose
term insurance.
If the need may turn out to be longer, look at a longer term
or go for a renewable or convertible term plan.
If the need is for the whole of your life, then choose whole
of life.
Unit Linked Policies
A Unit Linked Policy is a life assurance policy
that is linked to an investment in funds for the purpose of
building up savings coupled with the life protection.
The investments can be in shares, State fixed-interest
bonds and property. A certain number of units are purchased
in the fund with your investment. A Fund Manager manages the
fund which can go up or down in value, depending on the changes
in the value of the underlying assets. The principal difference
between a Unit Linked Fund and a Unit Trust is that the Unit
Linked Fund has the assurance policy attached to it.
Depending on the degree of acceptable risk, an investment
mix ranging from a spectrum of a zero risk fixed interest
fund to for example a high risk Japanese equities fund, with
much to choose from in-between, can be recommended to the
investor.
The 3 categories of Unit Linked Funds are:
- Secure Funds
(low risk) where investments have 100 per cent security
(short of a collapse of the financial system).
- Balanced Funds (medium risk) these
investments are made in a wide range of domestic and overseas
assets, with the objective of achieving enhanced capital
growth.
- Specialist Funds
(higher risk) These investments are made in a specific asset,
e.g. shares or property; or a specific region e.g. Ireland,
UK, US, Ireland to achieve high long-term growth.
With Profits Bonds/Policies
The decline in equity returns is prompting
life assurers to consider withdrawing from the 'with profits'
product market.
Investors in with-profits policies, such as
lump sum with-profits bonds or regular payment endowments,
receive two types of bonus. Once paid, an annual bonus cannot
be taken away provided the policy is held to maturity. However,
insurers are under no obligation to pay any terminal bonus,
whatever the estimates that are given in annual policy statements.
Some life companies have cut these bonuses four times last
year and the reductions are having a significant impact on
maturity values. The penalties for surrendering policies early
have also been increased.
The life insurers "smooth out" bonuses
in the good years so that payments can be made in bad return
periods. However, the sharp decline in equity values has prompted
the steep fall in bonus values.
The stronger the financial position of the
life company, the greater its ability to weather downturns
in the market.
The popular benchmark of stability, the 'free
asset ratio', which expresses as a percentage, the ratio of
excess assets in with-profits funds to cover liabilities,
is not considered to be reliable as there is no standard for
determining a company's future liabilities. The Association
of UK Insurers has recommended that life companies provide
independent credit ratings, similar to Standard & Poor's
or Moody's, the rating agencies, with all annual statements
sent to with-profits policyholders. However, things are seldom
simple. Some actuaries warn that credit ratings could give
investors a false sense of security as Equitable Life had
a good rating up to the late 1990's.
The U.K. industry regulator, the FSA, has
warned life companies to exercise caution in bonus declarations
in 2002, to avoid imperiling prospects for policyholders in
future years.
With-profits funds are mainly invested in
the stock market. So a poor market cannot be escaped from.
The smoothing range is generally between 95 to 105 per cent.
So the payout can actually be 5 per cent greater or less than
what your investment has actually earned.
In this year 2002, the impact of a number
of years of declining stock market returns is very evident.
In the U.K. for example, Scottish Widows is paying out £75,004
Sterling on a 25-year, £50 Sterling a month endowment,
down from £91,538 Sterling a year ago - an 18 per cent
change. Norwich Union has reduced its payout by 14%. It smoothes
in the range 90-110 per cent. However, 2 years of falling
stock market returns, prompted it to reduce its 2002 payout
by more than 10 per cent compared with 2001.
If you have any queries you can contact
us with your requirements.
|